I Tried Writing Python in VS Code and PyCharm – Here’s What I Found
A few years ago, learning Python was simple: install Python, open a text editor, and run scripts in a terminal.
Now? Beginners open YouTube and instantly face a war between VS Code, PyCharm, Vim, Jupyter, Neovim, AI plugins, dev containers, and 40 “must-have extensions.”
I’ve watched new Python learners spend more time configuring tools than actually writing Python.
And honestly, I made the same mistake.
When I first switched between VS Code and PyCharm, I expected one clear winner. Instead, I found something more interesting:
- One tool felt lightweight and flexible
- The other felt safer and more structured
- Both became frustrating in completely different ways
If you are learning Python in 2026, this choice matters more than people admit. Your editor affects:
- how quickly you debug
- whether you stick with Python
- how overwhelmed you feel
- and surprisingly… how much code you actually write
So I spent several weeks intentionally using both for real tasks instead of benchmark-style comparisons.
Not “Hello World.”
Real stuff:
- web scraping
- APIs
- virtual environments
- debugging broken imports
- small Flask projects
- AI scripts with local models
- Git workflows
- messy beginner mistakes
Here’s what actually happened.
My Testing Setup
To keep things realistic, I used both IDEs on the same machine:
| Setup | Details |
|---|---|
| OS | Windows 11 |
| RAM | 16GB |
| CPU | Ryzen 7 |
| Python Version | Python 3.12 |
| Projects Tested | Flask app, automation scripts, API tools |
| AI Tools | GitHub Copilot + local Ollama scripts |
I deliberately avoided “perfect setup” tutorials.
Instead, I installed things the way most beginners do:
- quickly
- imperfectly
- sometimes incorrectly
That ended up revealing the biggest differences.
First Impressions: VS Code Felt Faster, PyCharm Felt Smarter
The first thing I noticed:
VS Code felt like an empty workshop
It opens fast.
It looks clean.
It doesn’t force much on you.
But that freedom comes with hidden complexity.
The first time I installed Python support in VS Code, I needed to:
- install the Python extension
- select an interpreter
- configure linting
- install Jupyter support
- set formatting preferences
- fix terminal path issues
None of this is hard individually.
But together? It creates “setup fatigue.”
Especially for beginners.
PyCharm felt opinionated immediately
PyCharm, on the other hand, behaved like it already knew what I wanted.
I created a project and it automatically:
- created a virtual environment
- detected Python
- configured indexing
- enabled debugging
- handled imports properly
That sounds minor until you spend two hours debugging the wrong interpreter in VS Code.
And yes… I did that.
Quick Takeaway
VS Code optimizes flexibility.
PyCharm optimizes momentum.
That distinction became clearer the longer I used both.
Real-World Experience: Building an Actual Python Project
Instead of isolated tests, I built the same small Flask API in both environments.
The project included:
- API routes
- environment variables
- pip packages
- Git
- debugging
- JSON handling
- logging
This is where differences became obvious.
Using VS Code for Python
What I liked
VS Code felt incredibly lightweight.
Even with multiple files open:
- startup stayed fast
- search was excellent
- Git integration felt clean
- terminal workflow was smooth
And if you already work with:
- JavaScript
- Docker
- Markdown
- AI tools
- Linux terminals
…VS Code feels natural.
I also liked how easy it was to customize shortcuts and layouts.
But here’s what beginners usually don’t realize
VS Code is basically a platform, not a complete Python IDE.
That means your experience depends heavily on:
- extensions
- settings
- interpreter configuration
- plugin compatibility
One bad extension can make autocomplete weird.
One broken update can affect debugging.
I had this happen when Pylance indexing suddenly slowed down on a larger project.
Using PyCharm for Python
What I liked
PyCharm felt calmer.
Less fiddling.
Less configuration.
Less “Why is this broken?”
The debugger especially stood out.
When I made mistakes, PyCharm usually explained them clearly:
- unresolved imports
- wrong variable types
- bad package references
That sounds basic, but beginners massively underestimate how valuable this is.
The IDE often caught problems before I even ran the code.
Where PyCharm frustrated me
Performance.
Not catastrophic performance.
But noticeable.
Cold startup was slower.
Indexing large folders took time.
RAM usage was definitely heavier.
On my machine:
- VS Code averaged ~700MB–1.2GB RAM
- PyCharm sometimes crossed 2GB+
If your laptop has 8GB RAM, you will feel this difference.
Especially while running browsers, Docker, or local AI models simultaneously.
One Mistake I Made That Changed My Opinion
Initially, I treated VS Code like PyCharm.
Bad idea.
I kept trying to “complete” VS Code with more extensions:
- extra linters
- themes
- snippets
- AI assistants
- Git helpers
- notebook tools
Eventually my setup became messy.
Startup slowed down.
Autocomplete conflicted.
Keyboard shortcuts broke.
That’s when I realized something important:
VS Code works best when you intentionally keep it minimal.
PyCharm, meanwhile, works best when you lean into its built-in ecosystem.
This is a surprisingly important mindset difference.
Most comparison articles never mention it.
Step-by-Step: Which One Should Beginners Actually Choose?
Here’s the practical breakdown I wish someone had given me earlier.
Choose VS Code if:
You want one editor for everything
VS Code is excellent if you:
- code in multiple languages
- use terminals heavily
- learn web development too
- like customization
- prefer lightweight tools
You enjoy tweaking workflows
Some people genuinely enjoy configuring tools.
If that’s you, VS Code becomes extremely powerful.
Your computer is lower-end
For older laptops, VS Code usually feels smoother.
Especially under 8GB RAM.
Choose PyCharm if:
You only care about Python
This is the biggest factor.
PyCharm feels purpose-built for Python development.
You get overwhelmed easily
PyCharm reduces decision fatigue.
Beginners often underestimate how mentally exhausting tool configuration becomes.
You want better debugging
PyCharm’s debugging experience is genuinely excellent.
Especially for:
- beginners
- data analysis
- backend development
- large projects
Mini Case Study: A Beginner I Helped Switched Back to PyCharm
A friend of mine started learning Python using VS Code because “everyone online uses it.”
Within two weeks:
- interpreter problems appeared
- virtual environments got confusing
- extensions conflicted
- formatting stopped working
The actual Python learning stalled.
I suggested PyCharm Community Edition instead.
Within days:
- project setup became easier
- errors were clearer
- debugging became less scary
- focus shifted back to coding
This doesn’t mean VS Code is worse.
It means beginners often confuse:
“popular with developers”
with
“best for learning.”
Those are not always the same thing.
Pros and Cons
VS Code Pros
- Fast startup
- Lightweight
- Excellent extension ecosystem
- Great terminal integration
- Works for many languages
- Strong Git integration
- Feels modern and flexible
VS Code Cons
- Setup can become messy
- Requires extension management
- Python support depends on plugins
- Easier to misconfigure
- Debugging less beginner-friendly
PyCharm Pros
- Excellent Python intelligence
- Better debugging tools
- Cleaner beginner experience
- Strong refactoring support
- Virtual environments handled well
- Fewer setup headaches
PyCharm Cons
- Heavier RAM usage
- Slower startup
- Can feel bloated
- Some advanced features locked behind Professional edition
5 Non-Obvious Insights Most Articles Miss
These were the biggest surprises from actual long-term usage.
1. Beginners waste more energy on configuration than coding
This is massively underrated.
Tool friction kills motivation.
PyCharm reduces that friction early.
2. VS Code becomes better as your technical confidence grows
At first, flexibility feels confusing.
Later, it becomes empowering.
That transition point matters.
3. PyCharm teaches better debugging habits
Because debugging tools are easier to discover, beginners actually learn:
- breakpoints
- stack traces
- variable inspection
Earlier than they usually would.
4. Too many VS Code extensions quietly reduce productivity
I measured this on myself.
My most productive setup used:
- fewer themes
- fewer AI tools
- fewer helper plugins
Minimal setups reduce cognitive noise.
5. AI coding tools behave differently in each IDE
This surprised me.
Copilot suggestions felt more fluid in VS Code.
But PyCharm provided stronger context-aware inspections.
So:
- VS Code felt faster
- PyCharm felt safer
That’s a meaningful tradeoff in AI-assisted coding.
A Quick Comparison Table
| Feature | VS Code | PyCharm |
|---|---|---|
| Startup Speed | Faster | Slower |
| RAM Usage | Lower | Higher |
| Beginner Friendliness | Medium | High |
| Python Features | Extension-based | Built-in |
| Customization | Excellent | Moderate |
| Debugging | Good | Excellent |
| Multi-language Support | Excellent | Good |
| Setup Complexity | Medium–High | Low |
| Best For | Flexible workflows | Focused Python learning |
Pro Tips That Actually Help
In VS Code
Keep extensions minimal
Seriously.
Install only:
- Python
- Pylance
- GitHub Copilot (optional)
That’s enough for most beginners.
In PyCharm
Disable unused plugins
PyCharm gets noticeably faster when trimmed down.
Especially on mid-range laptops.
In Both
Learn virtual environments early
This matters more than editor choice.
Many “IDE problems” are actually Python environment problems.
Should I switch IDEs later?
Probably.
Many developers eventually use:
- VS Code for lightweight editing
- PyCharm for serious debugging/project work
That hybrid workflow is surprisingly common.
Final Thoughts: Which One Would I Personally Recommend?
After using both extensively, here’s my practical opinion:
If you are:
- completely new to Python
- easily overwhelmed
- focused only on Python
Start with PyCharm Community Edition.
It reduces friction and teaches good habits earlier.
But if you:
- already use multiple languages
- like terminals
- enjoy customization
- want one universal editor
Go with VS Code.
Personally?
I still use both.
VS Code for quick scripts and flexible workflows.
PyCharm for deeper debugging and larger Python projects.
And honestly, that’s probably the most realistic answer.
The best IDE isn’t the one with the most features.
It’s the one that keeps you writing Python instead of endlessly configuring your editor.
FAQ
Q1: Is VS Code better than PyCharm for Python?
Ans: Not universally. VS Code is more flexible. PyCharm is more focused. For pure Python learning, I’d lean PyCharm. For broader developer workflows, VS Code becomes stronger long term.
Q2: Is PyCharm too heavy for beginners?
Ans: Sometimes. On older laptops, it can feel sluggish. But the better debugging and automation often compensate for that.
Q3: Can beginners use VS Code successfully?
Ans: Absolutely. But they should keep the setup simple and avoid extension overload.
Q4: Which IDE is better for AI coding tools?
Ans: VS Code currently feels slightly ahead in ecosystem integration and responsiveness. But PyCharm’s inspections reduce AI-generated mistakes better.
Q5: Is PyCharm Professional worth paying for?
Ans: For most beginners, no. The Community Edition is already very capable.
Q6: Which IDE do professional Python developers use?
Ans: Both. Backend teams, data scientists, automation engineers, and AI developers use both heavily. The “real” industry answer is less tribal than YouTube makes it seem.